We care about your data, and we'd like to use cookies to give you a smooth browsing experience. Please agree and read more about our privacy policy.

The SPAC Boom

How Special Purpose Acquisition Companies Are Changing the IPO Games

Article Photo Large

The SPAC Boom: How Special Purpose Acquisition Companies Are Changing the IPO Game

In recent years, a new player has emerged on the IPO scene that is shaking up the traditional path for companies to go public: Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, or SPACs. SPACs have surged in popularity, attracting big-name investors and raising billions of dollars. But what exactly are SPACs, and how are they changing the IPO landscape?

What is a SPAC?

A SPAC, also known as a "blank check company", is a shell company that raises money through an IPO with the sole purpose of acquiring or merging with another company. The SPAC itself has no existing business operations. Instead, the SPAC's management team, called sponsors, use the funds raised in the IPO to search for a promising private company to take public through an acquisition or merger, usually within a 24-month timeframe. When a SPAC goes public, investors don't know what company it will ultimately acquire. They are essentially betting on the expertise and track record of the SPAC's sponsors to identify an attractive company to take public at an appealing valuation. Once the SPAC completes its merger with the target company, that company becomes publicly traded, providing it with the capital raised in the SPAC's IPO.

The Rise of SPACs

SPACs have been around for decades but have recently exploded in popularity. In 2020, SPACs raised over $80 billion, a more than 6-fold increase from the previous year and nearly as much as traditional IPOs. High-profile SPAC mergers in 2020 included DraftKings, Nikola, Virgin Galactic, and Opendoor. The momentum has continued in 2021, with hundreds of SPAC IPOs in the first quarter alone. Several factors have fueled the SPAC boom:

  • Abundant capital: In a low interest rate environment, yield-hungry investors have poured money into SPACs in search of returns. Many high-profile investors and celebrities have gotten involved as SPAC sponsors.
  • Faster process: SPACs offer a quicker, simpler path to going public compared to the lengthy traditional IPO process. For the target company, merging with a SPAC can provide a large capital infusion more quickly with less paperwork and regulatory scrutiny.
  • Valuation certainty: In a SPAC merger, the valuation and capital raised is negotiated and locked in up front. This provides more certainty compared to a traditional IPO where pricing happens the night before trading begins and can be impacted by market conditions.
  • Regulation changes: The SEC has eased some regulations around SPACs in recent years, making them a more viable path for companies to access public markets.

Pros and Cons of Investing in SPACs

For investors, SPACs offer the allure of getting in on the ground floor of the next big thing. But they also come with significant risks. Here are some key pros and cons to consider:

Pros

  • Potential upside: If a SPAC successfully merges with a promising company, early investors can reap significant returns as the stock price rises. Many recent SPACs have seen their shares soar after deal announcements.
  • Experienced management: SPACs are often led by experienced investors and executives who can leverage their expertise and networks to identify attractive acquisition targets and negotiate favorable deal terms.
  • Liquidity and limited downside: SPAC shares are publicly traded, providing liquidity for investors. And if the SPAC fails to complete a merger within the specified timeframe, investors can redeem their shares for their original investment plus interest.

Cons

  • Uncertainty and speculation: When investing in a SPAC, you don't know which company it will ultimately acquire, so you're essentially speculating on the sponsors' ability to execute. Many SPACs have seen their shares fall due to concerns around their merger targets.
  • Misaligned incentives: SPAC sponsors typically receive a 20% stake in the merged company for a nominal fee, giving them a strong incentive to complete a deal even if it's not in the best interest of shareholders. Sponsors benefit as long as the company they take public is valued higher than the cash raised in the SPAC's IPO.
  • Dilution: The sponsor's equity stake and other structuring fees can significantly dilute other shareholders' interests. SPAC shareholders can see their stakes diluted by 20-50% depending on redemption rates and deal terms.
  • Regulatory scrutiny: As SPACs have boomed, regulators have started to raise concerns around disclosures, projections, and conflicts of interest. Increased regulatory scrutiny could dampen the SPAC market.

Looking Ahead

SPACs have emerged as a major force in the IPO market, providing an attractive alternate route for certain companies to go public. For investors, SPACs offer high risk and high potential reward. While SPACs are likely here to stay, the surge in popularity has also brought excesses and concerns. As the large supply of SPACs competes for deal targets, it could lead to SPACs overpaying for acquisitions or taking inferior companies public. In addition, increased regulatory scrutiny and more discerning investors could put pressure on returns going forward. Ultimately, not all SPACs will be successful, and investors need to carefully examine each opportunity. As with any investment, individuals should assess their risk tolerance and do thorough research before buying into a SPAC. Looking ahead, it will be interesting to see how the SPAC boom evolves and reshapes the IPO landscape in the coming years.